By Roger V. Gould
This, he keeps, is simply because violence traditionally happens while an individual desires to in achieving superiority or dominance over another individual, whether there's no great reason behind doing so. In making the case for this unique inspiration, Gould explores a various diversity of examples, together with murders, blood feuds, vendettas, revolutions, and the standard disagreements that compel humans to behave violently. the result's an clever and provocative paintings that restores the research of clash to the guts of social inquiry.
Read or Download Collision of Wills: How Ambiguity about Social Rank Breeds Conflict PDF
Best violence in society books
Via Our Eyes presents a view of black men's reports that demanding situations students, coverage makers, practitioners, advocates, and scholars to grapple with the truth of race, gender, and violence in the US. This multi-level research explores the chronological lifestyles histories of 8 black males from the aftermath of worldwide battle II in the course of the chilly battle and into this present day.
Gasper examines even if drug use and delinquency give a contribution to early university leaving and no matter if the consequences vary for terrible and middle-class adolescence. effects recommend that drug use and delinquency upload little to factors of dropout. quite, drug use, delinquency, and dropout are pushed through a means of precocious improvement rooted in early institution failure.
This publication is the 1st to enquire the results of participation in separation or divorce court cases on femicide (murder of a female), femicide-suicide, murder, and suicide. simply because separation is without doubt one of the most important predictors of household violence, this ebook is completely dedicated to theorizing, gaining knowledge of, and fighting deadly family violence or different attacks caused through marital separation.
William C. Olsen, Walter E. A. van Beek, and the individuals to this quantity search to appreciate how Africans have faced evil round them. Grouped round notions of evil as a cognitive or experiential challenge, evil as malevolent approach, and evil as an inversion of justice, those essays examine what will be accredited and what has to be condemned as a way to overview being and morality in African cultural and social contexts.
- The Dark Side of Courtship: Physical and Sexual Aggression
- Gun Culture or Gun Control: Firearms, Violence and Society
- Nonviolent Resistance: A Philosophical Introduction
- Concentration camps : a short history
- What Virtue There Is in Fire: Cultural Memory and the Lynching of Sam Hose
- Interventions: Activists and Academics Respond to Violence
Extra info for Collision of Wills: How Ambiguity about Social Rank Breeds Conflict
Even if the current discussion ends with a 54 CHAPTER Two joint decision, things will still not be the same unless you receive an apology as well: otherwise, your friend will have arrogated at least the right to make further attempts at shifting the terms of your relationship. My argument, then, is that interpersonal conflict stems mostly from disagreements about the amount of dominance exerted in social relations. When two people get into a fight about a debt or about ownership of a mule, about whether the ball was in or out or whether it was all right to divulge a secret to a mutual friend, it is conventional to say that the fight was "about" the debt, the mule, the ball, or the secret.
But long-term relations need not be hierarchical, and even if they are there is no transaction-costs explanation for the fact that workers consistently occupy the subordinate position in them. The fact that firms are almost invariably hierarchical in this way needs to be distinguished from the mere fact that firms exist. 44 CHAPTER Two cal parents (with substitutes in anomalous cases such as orphans and abandoned children), whereas in other settings they may fall under the authority of whole collections of related adults, of uncles or aunts, or of older siblings.
I am jumping ahead, however. The goal of this section has not been to make theoretical claims about the connection between dominance and conflict but to set out a definition of dominance and to show that it can be meaningfully and reliably applied to a range of instances. The definition I have offered is not as thin as that employed by psychologists and ethologists, but it is a good deal thinner than others available in the social sciences more generally. What is useful about thin definitions, as I have just suggested, is that they permit one to start simply and only gradually build toward more elaborate propositions.